No Land’s Man - A take on the Rohingyas crisis and India’s trial
The extent of
de-humanization of humans, and human rights violations have reached a level of
normal acceptance in our society. Anyone speaking up to the unfortunate fellow
human beings has become upsetting to some of our fortunate fellow human beings
on the other side, be it in the first world or in fourth world countries. The
plight of Rohingyas is a live reflection
of the gigantic ugly side of humanity.
These people
are refused of any land beneath their feet by the rest of humankind. Though they lived in Myanmar since the 12th century, they have been denied
citizenship by the Buddhist majority country for the last 3 decades. This
action by the ‘followers of Buddha’
rendered these minority ethnic group effectively stateless.
The number of children,
old, women and men fleeing their homes, leaving everything behind, crossed
500,000 during the last 2 months. Those who survived the treacherous trek
through the mountains, forests, rivers and ocean reached some land, shattered,
drained, hungry and sick, only to be detained and deported back to their hell. Just
like their yesterday, their tomorrow too is almost extinct.
The context
During the British rule, Myanmar was
administered as a province of India. During that period, a large number of
labourers migrated from the then India (including the current Bangladesh) to
Myanmar. Now, the native Buddhists, supported by their government, consider
Rohingyas to be ‘Bengalis’ who migrated illegally during British rule. They
dismiss the term ‘Rohingya’ as a recent creation for political mileage. In
consequence, Rohingyas are excluded from Myanmar’s Citizenship Act and their
most basic rights including education, travel, marriage, religious practice,
access to healthcare services, etc. are restricted.
The so called
crackdown on the Rohingyas by the Myanmar security forces have often ended with
human rights abuses including rape, torture, arson and murder. Naturally, some
Rohingyas became rebels and took to arms to fight their oppressors. They called
themselves Rohingya Salvation Army and attacked few police posts and army bases
in revenge. In turn, Myanmar military intensified its atrocities against the
group including frequent indiscriminate firing at the unarmed, fleeing men,
women and children.
Several
independent reports have concluded that the UN in Myanmar has been
dysfunctional and it failed to ensure peace and security to the victims under
the pressure of Myanmar authorities.
It’s also
important to understand Myanmar’s political structure where the army has a strong
influence and firm grip on power. 25% of Parliament seats are reserved for the
army which is also in charge of home affairs in addition to defense and border related
affairs. It’s almost impossible for the democratic side of Myanmar’s power symmetry
to override the weight of the army. There are speculations that the army is
using the Rohingya issue to destabilize the democratic set up.
The puzzlement of Indian government
Indian
political stance on Rohingyas issue is apparently supported by some confused
wisdom along with many unpublished agenda. The government indeed has all the right to
stop illegal immigrants into the country. However, as regards deportation,
there are applicable international laws, which India seems to have chosen to
ignore. With some possible theories and assumptions guiding the decisions, India,
perhaps, is caught in a difficult spot in the whole issue. The government may well
be trying to perform a delicate balancing act in a sensitive regional political
ecosystem. Yet, humanity should be
placed above cognitive views and political compulsions.
India and Bangladesh
can certainly give cover to some refugees without any burden on their
economies, demography and on national security, while they can simultaneously
work on containing the flow of refugees. The least India can do is to desist
from calling the desperate refugees as terrorists when not even a single terror
charge has been made on any of the 40,000 Rohingyas in India. Forming a baseless
suspicion is a blatant prejudice.
India has been
an advocate of ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakum’, which means the whole world is one family irrespective of their nationality and faith. Such ideological concept shouldn't be used for mere political advantage. The Rohingya crisis is, indeed, an occasion for the Indian government and its people to uphold this noble philosophy.


